Psst: Tiger has a pre-nup … Who cares about jobs and war?

Tiger Woods

Image via Wikipedia

It was a busy day in Washington today.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the administration wasn’t really that serious about the July 2011 drawdown date for U.S. troops in Afghanistan. If you’ll recall, the date was the carrot to liberals that President Obama handed out in his speech explaining why he needs to send 30,000 more troops there (just for awhile).  Today Gates said,  “the pace, the size of the drawdown, is going to be determined in a responsible manner based on the conditions that exist at the time.”

Oh well, carrots are over-rated anyway.

Today, the administration rolled up its sleeves about unemployment, too, sponsoring a  jobs’ summit kicked off by the president himself.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke admitted to a Senate committee that he’d done too little to protect consumers from high risk mortgages.

And the U.S. Senate, The New York Times reports, approved an amendment to its health care legislation requiring insurers to offer free mammograms.

Oh yawn. Who cares.

Don’t these Washington types know the panting pack is busy chasing Tiger — with the public right behind?  This is hot news,  tales about Tiger’s pre-nup agreement and post-accident plans, about canceled tournaments and even about whether his bad driving will hurt sales of the Cadillac Escalade.

In short, this is news about — well, whatever can keep the American public’s collective mind focused on something that has absolutely no direct impact on its life.

Extra! Read all about it. Everywhere. When life gets too hard, let’s return to Rome and the circus. Maybe the bad news will go away.

Tiger Woods is rich, famous, likable — and involved in a salacious scandal!  That’s the ticket. To date, he’s been  the subject of 1.7 million posts on Google under the exact search term, “Tiger Woods’ accident,” and 10.7 million posts under Tiger Woods coupled anywhere with accident.  Stories about him today are listed — get this — as four of the top five “MOST POPULAR” on USA Today’s web site.  And yes, as of 4:45 p.m. today, stories about him hold all four of the top spots on your favorite blog hub —

I’d like to tell you I care.  But I don’t.  I’m actually a lot more interested in what Nicholas Kristof had to say about Afghanistan in today’s Times. His point: while the politicians and pundits and generals argued about the right course of action, no one bothered asking the Afghanis or those who work closely with them what they would have liked.  Here’s Kristof:

So why wasn’t the Afghan population more directly consulted?

“To me, what was most concerning is that there was never any consultation with the Afghan shura, the tribal elders,” said Greg Mortenson, whose extraordinary work building schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan was chronicled in “Three Cups of Tea” and his new book, “From Stones to Schools.” “It was all decided on the basis of congressmen and generals speaking up, with nobody consulting Afghan elders. One of the elders’ messages is we don’t need firepower, we need brainpower. They want schools, health facilities, but not necessarily more physical troops.”

Kristof offers these fun facts:

1. For the million or so dollars it costs to deploy one American soldier for a year in Afghanistan, it is possible to build “about 20 schools.”

2. Our country’s military spending in Afghanistan alone next year “will now exceed the entire official military budget of every other country in the world.”

Oh please, you say.  Just give me Tiger and a good glass of bubbly. Wake me up when the war ends and the American public is back to work.

Fair enough … if I’m still alive.

But for now, let me do some real reporting. Tiger, TIger, TIGer, TIGEr. TIGER.

There. Maybe now someone will read this post.

About jerrylanson

I teach, write, coach and sing, though you're not required to listen to the latter. I'm a journalism professor at Emerson College in Boston. My third book, "Writing for Others, Writing for Ourselves," was published in November by Rowman & Littlefield Publishing. You can read a sample chapter at My passions are politics (generally liberal in outlook), music, mountains, golden retrievers and my grandchildren, though not in that order. Please stop by and mix it up with me. I always answer those who post.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan, economics, Media, media coverage and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Psst: Tiger has a pre-nup … Who cares about jobs and war?

  1. ashikchris says:

    According to Secretary Clinton during her presentation to Congress after Obama’s speech, we *ARE* building schools and health centers. In fact, going on right is the single largest investment in transportation infrastructure since interstates in the 50s – just in Afghanistan, not the U.S.

    • Jerry Lanson says:

      That’s actually probably the best part of our policy there. But I’ve also heard on NPR that substantially over half of the money we’re sending to Afghanistan for such programs disappears …. and sometimes ends up arming the Taliban. Forgive me for forgetting the exact citation. The expert I heard said we need to be doubling down on tracing where the money we send there for redevelopment projects goes rather than tripling its amount.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s